<p></p><p>Understanding how best to
communicate with the American outbound travel market in the wake of a global
pandemic is essential for destination communities, tourism organizations, and
hospitality businesses seeking to attract this market to recover from the
pandemic. To date, the literature does not advise in terms of what messages to
communicate in post-disaster destination marketing. Consequently, marketers
often have to ad-lib their post-disaster communications that may or may not be
effective in encouraging visitors. This timely study aimed to mend this
knowledge gap. To this end, ideas were sought from industry and academic
experts on what message features may positively influence American visitors’
international travel intentions following the COVID-19 pandemic. Three rounds
of conventional Delphi research delivered a list of twenty-seven message
features, eight of which attained panel consensus. Thus, panel experts in the
Delphi study agreed that international destinations that 1) communicate the
message of <i>safety,</i> 2) include <i>factual pandemic information </i>such
as safety protocols at the destination,
3) feature<i> open outdoor spaces</i>, 4) <i>build visitors’ confidence</i>, 5) highlight <i>positive
destination attributes</i>, 6) <i>authentic local experience</i>, 7) showcase <i>locals’ support</i>
in welcoming visitors, and 8) <i>remind [visitors] of the joys of travel</i>
may positively influence American visitors’ international travel intentions
towards the destination after the COVID-19 pandemic. </p>
<p>Since the Delphi technique only
offers plausible outcomes, this study further used Solomon’s four-group
experimental methodology to examine the effect of a <i>safety</i> message on
Americans’ post-pandemic international travel intentions. The following
extraneous variables were statistically controlled in the experiment: the
visitors’ age, gender, education, income, travel experience, COVID-19
experience, perceived severity, susceptibility, political views, and knowledge
of COVID-19. Safety was selected for this examination because Delphi panel
experts most frequently mentioned <i>safety</i> as a key feature of
post-pandemic destination marketing messages to influence American visitors’
international travel intentions. Thus, a mock print advertisement presented a
safety message to three independent samples promoting a hypothetical small
island destination. The results revealed that the marketing message featuring <i>safety</i>
did not enhance international travel intentions among American visitors in any
of the three samples. On the contrary, the <i>safety</i> message had a
deleterious effect on American visitors’ post-pandemic international travel
intentions in this study. The findings also revealed a significant relationship
between Americans’ political views, COVID-19 knowledge, travel experience, the
experience of COVID-19, and their post-pandemic international travel
intentions. </p>
<p>This study contributes to the research
on post-disaster recovery, destination marketing, and safety communication in
several ways. Best to the researchers’ knowledge, this study is the first to
identify features of destination marketing messages that may influence the
international travel intentions of American visitors in the unique context of
the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the Delphi portion of this study identified several
new features of post-pandemic destination marketing messages that may
positively influence American visitors’ international travel intentions in the
unique context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of the Delphi study
isolated eight plausible message features with panel consensus that would need
to be examined further with quantitative analyses. Hence, this study created
avenues to expand the scientific knowledge of post-pandemic marketing message
features. This study is also the first to examine the effect of <i>safety</i>
messages on international travel intentions of American visitors after the
COVID-19 pandemic in an experiment.</p>
<p>The findings of this study have several
practical, theoretical, and methodological implications. The knowledge of
message features that may positively influence the international travel
intentions of American visitors will be beneficial for destinations interested
in the North American market. The experimental study has important insights for
destination communities, tourism organizations, and hospitality businesses in designing
<i>safety</i> messages. Safety has been a sensitive issue in tourism marketing.
Talking about destination safety in marketing messages is not a traditional
approach. There is insufficient empirical evidence to advise destination
communities, tourism organizations, and hospitality businesses on whether to
include safety in their marketing messages for post-pandemic recovery. The
present study addressed this gap and showed that safety messages might not
increase or even reduce post-pandemic international travel intentions among
some Americans. The findings of this study also have several theoretical
implications. First, this study addressed the call for research on marketing
communication for post-pandemic recovery. The findings of the experimental
study showed the deleterious effect of safety messages on American visitors’
international travel intentions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, adding
a new perspective to the discussion of safety communication in the context of
the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodologically this research contributes to tourism
crisis and disaster literature by demonstrating the use of conventional Delphi technique
for generating new ideas on post-pandemic destination marketing communication. Further,
it addressed the call to examine post-disaster marketing messages' effect
through experiments. A set of recommendations are made for destination
communities, tourism organizations, and hospitality businesses interested in
the American outbound travel market based on the findings of this study and a
review of extant literature. Limitations and directions for future research are
also discussed in detail.</p><p>This study was approved by Purdue University's Institutional Review Board.</p><br><p></p>