<p> On December 10, 2015, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
legislation to extend and revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA), was reauthorized. Almost two years later, the Illinois ESSA plan was
approved on August 31, 2017. This new reauthorization made extensive
amendments, including its state accountability and testing policy requirements,
which have significant implications on English language learners (ELLs). This
study aims to explore the critical policy actors' interpretation of policy
requirements and implementation by examining their exercises of power, values,
and the use of policy instruments during their decision-making process. Taking
Illinois as a case, interpretive policy analysis and general qualitative
analysis were utilized to analyze official documents and related texts,
newspaper articles, and interview data.</p><p><br></p><p> The findings reveal that operating with different values,
policy actors’ exercise of various power entangles the policy implementation
processes and significantly affect ELL education. Results also suggest that the
assessment flexibility provided by federal policy can be deceptive given its stringent
requirements and the state's limited capacity.
Therefore, the new innovative assessment demonstration authority in the
ESSA is not necessarily facilitating the assessment innovation, promoting the
educational equity by highlighting and closing achievement gaps between ELL and
non-ELLs. Furthermore, it is found that state and Chicago public schools have
competing accountability and assessment systems and values. More importantly, local
power and politics have more control over the policy implementation and
enactment at local level, which always have effects or consequences on
educating ELLs that are unanticipated. This study has also shown that economic
value plays a critical role in policy implementation at state and local level.
The implications on ELL education include prioritizing the development and
implementation of an effective ELL/Bilingual curriculum and minimizing the
influences of local control and assessment time by excluding ELLs from various
high-stakes assessments.</p><p></p><p></p>