<p>This study aimed to
investigate potential improvements in load estimation in the standard load
rating procedure of reinforced concrete slab and girder bridges. Three-Dimensional
(3D) Finite Element (FE) models were used to conduct refined analyses of
bridges using full-scale models that account for non-structural elements in
superstructure modeling. The rating results obtained from FE analysis for a
small sample of bridges indicated that Conventional Load Rating (CLR)
methodology could lead to conservative rating factors mainly due to demand
overestimation. A parametric study associated with demand assessment showed a
substantial impact of geometric features on bridge moment and shear values. The
study showed that edge-elements such as railings and end-diaphragms
significantly changed the distribution of loads over the bridge width due to
the edge-stiffening effect. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Effects from the
presence of edge components are not reflected in the methodology outlined in
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
specifications and may be a source of overestimation or underestimation of
demands on bridges. Potential improvements to current live load Distribution
Factor (DF) formulations were identified based on statistical studies where
bridge responses subjected to standard truck load configurations obtained from
FE analysis were compared to the current procedure’s corresponding results.
Modification Factors (MF) to live load DF were proposed to incorporate
secondary elements’ effect in demand estimates. Updated DFs could result in
more accurate rating factors when used in the CLR of existing slab and T-beam
bridges. This would benefit a great population of bridges conservatively rated
as structurally deficient. The proposed modifications could prevent unnecessary
rerouting, weight posting, bridge closure, and replacement.</p>