Purdue University Graduate School
Browse

WITNESSING A GAP: HOW DIGITAL FORENSIC EXPERT WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS DIFFER FROM ATTORNEY EXPECTATIONS

Download (842.58 kB)
Version 2 2023-04-13, 19:24
Version 1 2023-04-13, 18:23
thesis
posted on 2023-04-13, 19:24 authored by Megan Celeste PiperMegan Celeste Piper

Due to the increasing use of technology in everyday life, electronic evidence has become a vital part of nearly every criminal and civil trial. Such evidence can carry so much weight that it has been the “smoking gun” in a wide variety of cases, from traffic accidents to intellectual property disputes to murder. A computer forensics examiner is required to thoroughly analyze and interpret the data gathered from various sources; they can be an important ally in court by helping jurors understand the significance of the evidence. It is critical that expert witnesses aim to be highly qualified to testify in court. However, currently there are only minimal qualifications to testify as a digital forensics expert witness. Without proper standards, the wrong verdict could be determined. This research aimed to determine if there is a gap between the preference for qualifications for digital forensics experts and what qualifications such experts have actually attained. A group of attorneys and officers were asked to participate in an online survey study for which they were presented with questions on desired and attained qualifications. While this study showed that expert witnesses mostly met lawyer expectations, it also demonstrated that there is  need for standardized qualifications for expert testimony.

History

Degree Type

  • Master of Science

Department

  • Computer and Information Technology

Campus location

  • West Lafayette

Advisor/Supervisor/Committee Chair

Marcus Rogers

Advisor/Supervisor/Committee co-chair

Dawn Laux

Additional Committee Member 2

John Springer

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC